One of the most common discussions regarding the Scrum Framework is if there are too many meetings within a Sprint ? Is this allowing enough time for the development team to work towards the Sprint Goal ? Typically, there are 4 Scrum events defined at the Scrum Guide :
- Sprint Planning
- Daily Scrum
- Sprint Review
- Sprint Retrospective ( We call this simply as Retro :))
Let’s figure out the total number of hours spent on 4 events along the Sprint. We are running 2 weeks long Sprints and the scheduled events are taking 2 hours, 15 minutes/day, 1 hour and 2 hours respectively. Hence, the number of hours spent during the event is 7,5 hours within a Sprint. Considering each work day as 8 hours, this refers to almost 10% of the total Sprint time. Depending on the characteristics of the team, this ratio may go up to 15%.
As you would agree spending 10% of the Sprint time for the Scrum events is feasible. In return, the team makes the wise planning driven by the priorities, come together everyday to get fully aligned, share and demonstrate Sprint results with the stakeholders and finally have the opportunity for self-inspection and identify improvement points. If none of these meeting had exist during the Sprint, the team would still need to organize meetings to discuss all the details and probably would spent much more time. In essence, running Scrum events in such a structed way is serving well to the productivity goal of the team among others.